Saturday, February 8, 2014

‘the Main Reason as to Why There Were so Many Poor People in the 1600’s Was Because They Were Lazy’….Do I Agree?

The 1600s was a percentage point of great failure for the undivided of England. The countries general prices combined with a level compass point of profits meant that community became practically worse off. Moreover, the report that in the period of between 1642-1649, Britain was undergoing throneive change collect to the Civil War. These both(prenominal) attributed to grass becoming poorer.or was it just the simple fancy that none of this would hand over affected them so harshly, if they hadnt of been so inert? In my opinion they were non affected mainly by laziness, but by the general economic slump at the time. I animadvert this because firstly, at this period in register the universe of communication of England was growing at an exponential rate. I agnise this because at that place were approximately 4 million people in 1600, and it grew to more or less 5 ½ million by 1700 (localhistories.org), which therefore shows that the community was increasing. I can therefore infer from this that this made people poorer ascribable to three major thoughts. Firstly, as more people were roughly to do work, it meant that employers could afford to pay workers less, due to the idea that there would always be others to take their place, and also due to the idea that, as more people were trying to ticktack definite jobs, it meant that more people would be counted as unemployed. Secondly, due to the idea that more people were around, it meant that more solid solid food would be required. This also meant that, as food would be running short, it meant that food prices became higher, so people had to pay more for food. This in disco biscuit meant that families could non provide as very much, so many became jovial poor and needy. This may have also been due to mass inflation at the time: By 1600 food onward motion on average five times as much as they had in 1500; the cost of living rose by over 35%. This meant that more people became poor, as they could not afford to buy as muc! h. Thirdly, the idea that, as the state was increasing, it meant that more accommodation would need to be built and maintained. This in turn...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.